Keeping it in the family: Debating the ethics of uterine transplants and commercial surrogacy

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Keeping it in the family : Debating the ethics of uterine transplants and commercial surrogacy. / Kroløkke, Charlotte; Petersen, Michael Nebeling.

Bioethics Beyond Altruism: Donating and Transforming Human Biological Materials. red. / Rhonda M. Shaw. Springer, 2017. s. 189-213.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kroløkke, C & Petersen, MN 2017, Keeping it in the family: Debating the ethics of uterine transplants and commercial surrogacy. i RM Shaw (red.), Bioethics Beyond Altruism: Donating and Transforming Human Biological Materials. Springer, s. 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_8

APA

Kroløkke, C., & Petersen, M. N. (2017). Keeping it in the family: Debating the ethics of uterine transplants and commercial surrogacy. I R. M. Shaw (red.), Bioethics Beyond Altruism: Donating and Transforming Human Biological Materials (s. 189-213). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_8

Vancouver

Kroløkke C, Petersen MN. Keeping it in the family: Debating the ethics of uterine transplants and commercial surrogacy. I Shaw RM, red., Bioethics Beyond Altruism: Donating and Transforming Human Biological Materials. Springer. 2017. s. 189-213 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_8

Author

Kroløkke, Charlotte ; Petersen, Michael Nebeling. / Keeping it in the family : Debating the ethics of uterine transplants and commercial surrogacy. Bioethics Beyond Altruism: Donating and Transforming Human Biological Materials. red. / Rhonda M. Shaw. Springer, 2017. s. 189-213

Bibtex

@inbook{7b107a1797de415b8ce0dde6f10af00e,
title = "Keeping it in the family: Debating the ethics of uterine transplants and commercial surrogacy",
abstract = "In Danish and Swedish ethical and media debates, uterine transplants, in sharp contrast to commercial surrogacy, get positioned as a maternal gift-giving act. We argue that uterine transplants become (unlike commercial surrogacy arrangements) positioned in the private , intimate sphere of an individual known living donor (frequently the woman{\textquoteright}s mother, a sibling, mother-in-law, or a friend) donating her viable but no longer individually needed uterus to help a known recipient (daughter, sister, daughter-in-law, or friend) experience pregnancy and birth. We propose the concept of bio-intimacy to help make sense of the ways that the uterus, upon separation from the older woman{\textquoteright}s body, achieves discursive and material agency while it, in commercial surrogacy cases, is reframed as the exploitation of a less empowered, non-intimate other woman.",
author = "Charlotte Krol{\o}kke and Petersen, {Michael Nebeling}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_8",
language = "English",
pages = "189--213",
editor = "Shaw, {Rhonda M.}",
booktitle = "Bioethics Beyond Altruism",
publisher = "Springer",
address = "Switzerland",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Keeping it in the family

T2 - Debating the ethics of uterine transplants and commercial surrogacy

AU - Kroløkke, Charlotte

AU - Petersen, Michael Nebeling

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In Danish and Swedish ethical and media debates, uterine transplants, in sharp contrast to commercial surrogacy, get positioned as a maternal gift-giving act. We argue that uterine transplants become (unlike commercial surrogacy arrangements) positioned in the private , intimate sphere of an individual known living donor (frequently the woman’s mother, a sibling, mother-in-law, or a friend) donating her viable but no longer individually needed uterus to help a known recipient (daughter, sister, daughter-in-law, or friend) experience pregnancy and birth. We propose the concept of bio-intimacy to help make sense of the ways that the uterus, upon separation from the older woman’s body, achieves discursive and material agency while it, in commercial surrogacy cases, is reframed as the exploitation of a less empowered, non-intimate other woman.

AB - In Danish and Swedish ethical and media debates, uterine transplants, in sharp contrast to commercial surrogacy, get positioned as a maternal gift-giving act. We argue that uterine transplants become (unlike commercial surrogacy arrangements) positioned in the private , intimate sphere of an individual known living donor (frequently the woman’s mother, a sibling, mother-in-law, or a friend) donating her viable but no longer individually needed uterus to help a known recipient (daughter, sister, daughter-in-law, or friend) experience pregnancy and birth. We propose the concept of bio-intimacy to help make sense of the ways that the uterus, upon separation from the older woman’s body, achieves discursive and material agency while it, in commercial surrogacy cases, is reframed as the exploitation of a less empowered, non-intimate other woman.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_8

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_8

M3 - Book chapter

SP - 189

EP - 213

BT - Bioethics Beyond Altruism

A2 - Shaw, Rhonda M.

PB - Springer

ER -

ID: 252411354